Whether the system has intellect? Whether the system is conscious?
The question is not about what would happen on the planet where all organisms and human beings were without egoing. The real question is how we could achieve a better world and what kinds of better worlds are feasible.
I am dealing with thinking, not philosophy. If those who call themselves philosophers are engaged in something other than thinking, then I do not need their so-called philosophy.
The question is about which system, which people, and which ideology are capable of enduring the stone age.
Banning presenting such facts and arguments that try to show that the war is indeed justified is itself unjustified.
He presented compelling arguments to justify the unjustified war.
What is a greater crime: killing more people, but randomly or killing more people of the given nationality?
If the victims’ number increases, the seriousness of the given crime might not increase because the type of crime may change.
It is evident that the US/NATO argument from the freedom of joining military blocks is fallacious as these blocks are not charity organizations. Perhaps the argument can be improved, but the conflict remains: one has the freedom to join, and the other has corresponding security concerns.
As my first post in that group, I shared the abstract of my philosophy presentation “Institutional Degeneration of Science” given at Estonian Annual Philosophy Conference 2017 (Tallinn Technical University). I also added a link to my corresponding paper later published. Accidentally, it was published in a Chinese philosophy journal with the representation in NY — because other philosophyContinue reading “REDDIT’s SUBREDDIT r/PhilosophyofScience BLOCKED MY POST”
Popular schemes contrasting religion with science have been outdated.
Western science is under the heavy influence of politics and ideologies and has sold itself out, becoming itself a religion.